Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ware" Results 121 - 140 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 10:19 pm
Each state has different rules.In New York, as it happens, our highest court dealt with the subject this year in Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
  The case has been pending for several years before Second Circuit Court Judge Denny Chin under Authors Guild v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
I think that oftentimes people refer to infringement as theft in the colloquial sense of the word, but it’s the legal meaning of the term that I will focus on. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce Boyden
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce E. Boyden
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
They aren't doing so to confuse people, but because it is a design aesthetic. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:42 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Federal Court of Canada ruled in Société Gamma Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But earlier law society publications, not needing any such “urgency scenarios” with which to sell their wares with straight-faced exaggeration or excessive minimization, don’t mention such “self-represented litigant” figures at all. [read post]