Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Woods" Results 521 - 540 of 1,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm by William Ford
Twenty percent of the people polled remain undecided. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Changes to it can only change through the procedures laid out in Article V. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
And, not to brag, but I'm pretty sure we're going to get another $50 added to our budget, which will allow us to invite another 8 people to Harpdrygal V next year. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
  Similarly, perhaps Second Amendment advocates can and should be able to use the ruling in Miller v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm by CJLF Staff
"  Judge Diane Wood ruled, relying on the language in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
Moreover, we alleged that her arrest was without a lawful warrant, probable cause or other lawful authority in violation of the rights guaranteed by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Finally, we sought to suppress any statements obtained from our client, as well as her identity, were obtained in violation of her rights pursuant to the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, sections 9, 16, and… [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am by ACS
Thurman of the Magistrate Court in Lee County, Ga., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
Parker did, saying for that and other reasons she found Wood less than credible. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Nicholas Weaver argued that the WPA-2 flaw should not be concerning to average people. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
See also Hart, 717 F.3d at 155 (“‘a Lanham Act false endorsement claim is the federal equivalent of the right of publicity’”, taken from the Tiger Woods right of publicity case, ETW Corp. v. [read post]