Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Woods" Results 581 - 600 of 1,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
No — even if some people say there is, there isn’t. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
  They are the co-authors of Secular Government, Religious People (forthcoming, Eerdmans Publishing Co., July 2014). [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am by Marty Lederman
  Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: 1.7 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Driver for Injury Suffered After Rear-End by 18-Wheeler Truck – Kolodzik v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
It is estimated that 250,000 people die each year in the United States as a result of medical malpractice according to the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
I'm interrupting my series of posts on Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood not only to wish Balkinization readers a happy and health new year, but also to explain a bit about the religious nonprofit organization cases that are suddenly in the news. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 12:52 pm
 Why David Virgo decided to "shoot his way out" -- or, more accurately, fire shots indiscriminately into the woods -- and then give up is beyond me.Apart from the fact that he's probably seen too many movies. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
”  Many people receive such services through Medicare, or Medicaid, or by purchasing a plan (often with substantial government subsidies) on a government-run “exchange. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialty Store v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm by Joey Fishkin
 (Indeed, you are required by law to get it—or perhaps not exactly required, see NFIB v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
The case is discussed here for informational purposes only.Woods v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
”  And at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses yesterday’s denial of review in Martin v. [read post]