Search for: "The People v. Chambers" Results 61 - 80 of 1,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
After long proceedings at national level, a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on 16 December 2008 (Case C-73/07), and after the Court of Human Rights Chamber judgment of 21 July 2015, the Grand Chamber on 27 June 2017 finally found no violation of the right to freedom of expression and information in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:41 pm by Meri Baghdasaryan
The ECtHR laid out its intermediary liability rules in Delfi A.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am by CMS
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:03 am
  The winning party wins.The only people who are unhappy are the losing sides. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Activist high court, no-fault PPI auto insurance, assignment-of-benefits (AOB) claims helped Florida win top Judicial Hellhole ranking from American Tort Reform Foundation [Amy O’Connor, Insurance Journal] Maybe getting people interested in the age-old ethical dangers of champerty and maintenance would be easier if litigation finance were framed as a Chamber of Commerce vs. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]