Search for: "The People v. Clark" Results 321 - 340 of 904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
This form of investing by sovereigns has become an important new element in emerging patterns of governance in this century (Clark et al., 2010; Gilson & Milhaupt 2007–8). [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am by INFORRM
Ashley Hurst is a Partner specialising in media and internet disputes at Osborne Clarke LLP [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:55 am
" And at the "Lawfare" blog, Adam Klein has a post titled "Thoughts on the Opinion in Spokeo v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
On 20 October 2007, he responded to a 9–1–1 call reporting multiple people on Piper Street bitten by a dog. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
With dozens of different brand name frozen vegetable products being recalled, and the sick stretching from Washington, California and Maryland (with the numbers and places likely to rise), what do you need to know about this very nasty bug? [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
The law isn’t limited to people who are in prison or on probation (whose First Amendment rights are sharply reduced because of that); it applies even to people who had finished serving their sentences. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
They “dispose of public rights held by the government on behalf of the people. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Many know her as the judge in the Apple v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
R. v Clarke, 2016 ONSC 1510 [10] Finally, the officer’s testimony in court was frequently evasive or misleading. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
Senator Philip Hart (D-Michigan) remarked that people might have the “accurate impression that U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:48 pm by Elie Mystal
Marcia Clark saw a “black” woman and thought: I can work with that. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:00 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
These “mixed-motive” terminations were recently addressed by the California Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]