Search for: "The People v. Clark" Results 121 - 140 of 895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2007, 12:45 pm
In his private capacity he is co-counsel for the plaintiffs in Parker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Just like the US Constitution does not mandate the use of a specific interpretive methodology, it also does not mandate the use of any canons of construction--thus leaving this issue to the people who actually interpret the Constitution to do with as they see fit.The short version of my response is that I am not persuaded by Clark's argument on its own terms. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Clark, June 18, 2015, 9-0 on the judgment, two dissenting votes on the main issue and one hard to classify vote. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Clark is a civ pro legend. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm by Unknown
Clark County Sheriff's Office (Indian Gaming)Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2020.htmlPicard v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]