Search for: "The People v. Dukes" Results 61 - 80 of 783
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2007, 8:11 pm
Then this episode of the Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, entitled Gender, Sexuality & the Military is for you. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:43 pm
Mktg., L.L.C., 61 Cal. 4th 988 (2015); In re Estate of Duke, 61 Cal. 4th 871 (2015); In re Marriage of Davis, 61 Cal. 4th 846 (2015); People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Aston described the claimant as a “feminist cretin” and said that she “set fire to people’s money”. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by KC Johnson
John Hope Franklin, whose legacy Arcidiacono treads upon, provided research for Thurgood Marshall in the Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:48 pm
Photo Album: District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
The Met were rebuked by the information commissioner’s office (ICO) for video surveillance of the March 2019 protest, which was attended by up to 10,000 children and young people, the Guardian reports. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:49 am by Distinctlydigital
This case (R v Gold & Schifreen (1988) 1 AC 1063) resulted in the Computer Misuse Act 1990. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 5:52 am
Drake; Posted on a website for UC Irvine students, faculty and staff, this letter was signed online by 160 people in four hours. [read post]