Search for: "The People v. Gardner" Results 201 - 217 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
Given the recent hubbub over Danielle Citron's call to silence the cyberbullies as a matter of civil rights, based upon the claim that it disproportionately hurts the feelings of women, the 9th Circuits decision in Gardner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 11:37 am
Presumably it would include a wide range of other contemporary radio content as well.To represent the holding mathematically, one might say: Defamation + Defamation + Defamation = No Defamation.You can understand where this principle comes from, since if people really do not put actual faith in anything you say as a statement of fact, it's hard to call it "defamatory," since statements of opinion are protected. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
But circumstances do arise where people are so incompatible that they simply cannot live together. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:14 pm by Matthew Gardner
Basically, a good summary of the theory stated by the Missouri Court of Appeals in Gardner v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:52 am
Alok Gupta (thanks) kindly pointed out the judgment in Om Prakash v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:23 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKReal PropertyRemand to Surrogate's Court Denied in Suit to Bar Deceased's Partner's Sale of Manhattan Building Gardner v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:10 pm
Gardner, 387 US 136, and then, to the issues of MedImmune, the case Altvater v. [read post]
1 Oct 2006, 12:19 pm by Philip Mann
(Oh, I know, you just apply the clear guidance of Phillips v. [read post]
1 Oct 2006, 12:19 pm
(Oh, I know, you just apply the clear guidance of Phillips v. [read post]