Search for: "The People v. Gardner" Results 161 - 180 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/uh4sqGyvPW -> ALJ Lord Grants Motion For Summary Determination Of No Copyright Infringement In Certain TV Programs http://t.co/rfG4i1r2iS -> ECommerce vendor not entitled to DMCA hosting safe harbor Gardner v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It comes up in the context of the Mark Gardner Rule. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Charon QC
  Judging by the response and the downloads, people seem to enjoy them. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s retaliation claim also was remanded for the lower court to consider, in the first instance, her argument that she had direct evidence of retaliation (Gardner v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Wagner
In an excellent post on the Head of Legal blog, Carl Gardner suggests the following solution: allow any convicted prisoner to apply to the judge when sentenced to imprisonment to lift, in his or her case, the ban on voting in general elections to Westminster and the devolved national legislatures. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:58 pm by charonqc
” Carl Gardner, ex-government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog, writes: Binyam Mohamed: finally, an end “I’m sorry it’s taken me so long to comment on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R(Mohamed) v Foreign Secretary. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6]  Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
And let’s go for a hat trick of good reads (not that the blog posts which I refer to below are not good reads… they are… but Carl Gardner, on his Head of Legal blog, writes: Supreme Court judgment: Sugar v BBC “The Supreme Court has today given judgment in this case, about the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to information the BBC holds for journalistic purposes…. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]