Search for: "The People v. Harding" Results 61 - 80 of 9,877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2016, 9:31 am by CJ.Harding
Most people believe it is when two people live together as a couple for some amount of time. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Gerard Magliocca
 The Supreme Court held in Pyler v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
We don't want delusional people defending themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:41 pm
  (Though not nearly as hard as the victim, Stanley Spaeth, learned it. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
T.M. was one of the people who victimized the accused. 42 The effects of bullying have just now begun to attract the attention of public authorities. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
”It might be hard for you to face it. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am by David Super
  In the forty-five years since Bakke, hard quotas have been outlawed. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
It just seems to me that the jury here was hard core: that it thought that someone who killed an elderly couple whom he knew (and was previously very nice towards) for meaningless reasons always deserves to die. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:05 am
 To say that we're hard core about molestation offenses is an understatement. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
It just seems a stark, very binary sentence.At a minimum, you'd think that someone with such a sentence hanging over his head would work very hard to make sure he didn't reoffend during the three years he was on probation. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:06 pm
  You're going to be hard pressed to persuade someone that, at this point, taking a 28-year old off the street until he's 60 or so (assuming time off for good behavior) is unconstitutionally excessive.On an only tangentially related note, I had to reflect on my own mental competence when I stumbled over a portion of Justice Murray's opinion. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Kopatz was in serious debt.But there's an incredibly slim amount of hard evidence that he actually committed the crimes. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
  Given all the facts contained in the 113-page opinion, I can see why it took the jury around a week to deliberate; it's super hard to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.But find him guilty they did. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
 The law of burglary -- especially in California -- is so far afield from what one would initially conceive that it's hard to fathom. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 9:45 am
  But Justice Rushing does a pretty good job of articulating the various reasons why Section 1340 might indeed best be limited to the types of "hard print" investments prevalent in old (but not new) media. [read post]