Search for: "The People v. Morris" Results 201 - 220 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Isaac Park
But he admits that “it’s been a long time” since he’s read Gideon v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:06 am
 * Other people's computersThe excitement and conveniences that the Internet of Things (IoT) brings come with high prices, such as the vulnerability to hacking, privacy concerns and consumer rights. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 11:31 pm
Full report: Family Law Week.Morris v Morris [2016] EWCA Civ 812 (10 August 2016)Appeal by husband against, inter alia, committal order made on the wife's application by way of judgment summons for maintenance arrears and variation of maintenance order. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
These subsidiary requirements under Florida’s medical negligence laws were at issue in a recent decision from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, Morris v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
These subsidiary requirements under Florida’s medical negligence laws were at issue in a recent decision from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, Morris v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
These subsidiary requirements under Florida’s medical negligence laws were at issue in a recent decision from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, Morris v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was an application in the case of Morris v Local World Ltd. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
  Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]