Search for: "The People v. Morris"
Results 221 - 240
of 627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:51 am
People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
People v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am
These subsidiary requirements under Florida’s medical negligence laws were at issue in a recent decision from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, Morris v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am
These subsidiary requirements under Florida’s medical negligence laws were at issue in a recent decision from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, Morris v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am
These subsidiary requirements under Florida’s medical negligence laws were at issue in a recent decision from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, Morris v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:59 am
Templo hired Morris Mortgage Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Morris v Local World Ltd. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:20 am
Consider Kienow v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:34 am
Brigit Morris was a legal officer at the Australian Law Reform Commission. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case is Morris Branson Theatre v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case is Morris Branson Theatre v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:21 pm
Brigit Morris was a legal officer at the Australian Law Reform Commission and worked on its 2014 inquiry into Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Philip Morris, Inc., 209 P.3d 271, 274 (Nev. 2009); Leaf v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:52 am
v=lG6cWhJC8qY The post Tobacco Executives and Their Top 10 Quotes appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
