Search for: "The People v. Morris"
Results 381 - 400
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 9:37 am
June 23, 2011), we can’t comment on the case.But some other people have. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
In that case, Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:39 am
As Lyle Denniston notes, the Court will probably address the issue in Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(IP Think Tank) Most people touting IP Strategy are selling snake oil – don’t believe them (IP Think Tank) IAM names the world’s leading IP strategists (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands How to ‘verb up’ your brand naming (NameWire) Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken (IPKat) Global – Patents Top NPE counsel Ray Niro attacks new Article One service (IAM) (IPBiz) Global – Copyright Final version of ACTA posted (Michael Geist) Goodbye Cathy:… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:11 am
" Morris v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
First there is the basic point that when wealthy claimants sue impecunious defendants there is an inequality of arms (Steel and Morris v UK (2005) 41 EHRR 22 at paras 72, 98). [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Morris was convicted of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and sentenced to three years of probation, 400 hours of community service, a fine of $10,050, and the costs of his supervision. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Morris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The courts have stressed that, to give proper protection for responsible journalism, the defence must be applied in a practical and workable manner: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC; Harper v Seaga [2009] 1 AC 1 PC. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:19 pm
" Peter Kafka at All Things Digital points out that many people in the industry agree. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
People favor their own product portfolio: cereal companies have good sodium standards, but lax sugar standards, whereas McDonald’s has decent sugar standards but no sodium standards. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
In 2008, the Texas Supreme Court decided a case styled, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:20 am
Moreover, State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Vacic V, McCarthy S, Malhotra D, Murray F, Chou H-H, Peoples A, Makarov V, Yoon S, Bhandari A, Corominas R, Iakoucheva LM, Krastoshevsky O, Krause V, Larach-Walters V, Welsh DK, Craig D, Kelsoe JR, Gershon ES, Leal SM, Aquila M, Morris DW, Gill M, Corvin A, Insel PA, McClellan J, King M-C, Karayiorgou M,Levy DL, DeLisi LE, Sebat J. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 3:43 am
[Frye v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Last week the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Pineda v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
Ferrer for the Southern District of Florida; Special Agent in Charge John V. [read post]
