Search for: "The People v. Nicholls" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
How will we the people know? [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Dicta in RM (AP) (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland) (SC(Sc) [2012] 1 WLR 3386, [2012] UKSC 58 (which considered Regina v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:17 am by Thaddeus M. Lenkiewicz
’s motion for summary judgment in the matter of Carolyn Nichols, as Executrix of the Estate of Iva Pearl Jones, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Judge Hand in Nichols, and Judge Charles Hough in Dymow v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6086, involves a long-brewing nondelegation question regarding the federal Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act that the court passed on back in 2015 when it granted cert on another SORNA question in Nichols v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:37 pm by Admin
In its place, the court ruled that in relation to dishonesty, the test should be an objective one as established by Nicholls L.J. in the civil law case of Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 and Hoffmann L.J. in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37): “Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm by Admin
In its place, the court ruled that in relation to dishonesty, the test should be an objective one as established by Nicholls L.J. in the civil law case of Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 and Hoffmann L.J. in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37): “Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The test of dishonesty is as set out by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan and by Lord Hoffmann in Barlow Clowes… When dishonesty is in question the fact-finding tribunal must first ascertain (subjectively) the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the facts. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by Liisa Speaker
EPIC provides a list of people who can be appointed as a ward’s guardian, including someone who the ward chooses. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]