Search for: "The People v. Nicholls" Results 41 - 60 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 3:22 am by INFORRM
” On this basis, and for various other reasons, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Claimant was not “likely” to obtain a final injunction at trial in accordance with the test set out in section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”) and the judgment of Lord Nicholls in Cream Holdings v Banerjee ([2005] 1 AC 253), and therefore lifted the injunction that it had previously granted. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
The facts in Nichols v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
  The case is People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Effects of past chronic stress on explorative v. exploitative thinking—when people experience the world as harsh and unfair, people stick to what they know rather than exploring new options. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
I have been following with interest the software patent case of Symbian v Comptroller General for Patents. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:07 am
APPELLATE TERMCriminal Practice Constitutional Issue Not Properly Before Village Justice; Dismissal Reversed, Charge Re-Instated People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 pm
Most people seem to think that’s how the law works. [read post]