Search for: "The People v. Nicholls" Results 81 - 100 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 11:37 am by Daniel Costa-Roberts
This law is fatally flawed and unpopular, so it makes perfect sense for candidates to keep talking about how it’s harming people. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
ZDNet's Steven Vaughan-Nichols, who likes open source far better than patents, thinks the PAI is, for the time being, "foggy on the details".It's not purely a coincidence that Apple would take a more active role than ever before in patent policy during the opening week of the Apple v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
We can find no clearer statement of judicial antipathy to expert witness advocacy than the famous copyright decision by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:17 pm
People like James Nichols (the protagonist in the Time Magazine story) can do much better under state law. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
These people are the salt of the earth and there is no gray in their lives. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:57 am
 As for your question, the standard of review is best described by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
The Court also re-listed for a second time in Nichols v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Nichols' murderous rampage at the Fulton County Courthouse, the Georgia Court of Appeals has revived civil suits filed by two surviving staff members of slain Superior Court Judge Rowland W. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He endorsed Lord Nicholls observations in Campbell that the courts needed to guard against using as a touchstone a test which imported considerations which were properly part of the proportionality assessment rather than the engagement or ambit of Article 8. [read post]