Search for: "The People v. Nicholls" Results 81 - 100 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2016, 6:47 pm by Rishabh Bhandari
” Kammen worries that without this preface, “some people with thin skin might take offense” at what he’s about to say. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am by INFORRM
” On this basis, and for various other reasons, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Claimant was not “likely” to obtain a final injunction at trial in accordance with the test set out in section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”) and the judgment of Lord Nicholls in Cream Holdings v Banerjee ([2005] 1 AC 253), and therefore lifted the injunction that it had previously granted. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am by Emma Cross
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Idea/expression dichotomy: Nichols/Learned Hand abstraction test. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 10:28 pm by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: New California Law Boosts Worker Protections For School Leave, January 6, 2016, Capital Public Radio, By Chris Nichols More Blog Entries: Walz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Since we appear to be drifting toward the cert. pool’s seamier shoals, let’s go ahead and get two-time relist Nichols v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
The Court also re-listed for a second time in Nichols v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
The facts in Nichols v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:34 am by Steven Eversole
Additional Resources: Charleston shooting suspect charged with federal hate crimes, July 22, 2015, Reuters More Blog Entries: Batts v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He endorsed Lord Nicholls observations in Campbell that the courts needed to guard against using as a touchstone a test which imported considerations which were properly part of the proportionality assessment rather than the engagement or ambit of Article 8. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He endorsed Lord Nicholls observations in Campbell that the courts needed to guard against using as a touchstone a test which imported considerations which were properly part of the proportionality assessment rather than the engagement or ambit of Article 8. [read post]