Search for: "The People v. Nicholls" Results 101 - 120 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He endorsed Lord Nicholls observations in Campbell that the courts needed to guard against using as a touchstone a test which imported considerations which were properly part of the proportionality assessment rather than the engagement or ambit of Article 8. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
People v Tims, 449 Mich 83, 95, 99, 103-104; 534 NW2d 675 (1995). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Idea/expression dichotomy: Nichols/Learned Hand abstraction test. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
How will we the people know? [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eric Lipman reminds us about Terry Nichols in prison, not notable for being African-American, but rather for his role in the Oklahoma City bombing. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:14 am by David Oscar Markus
From the WSJ blog quoting from the dissent:“No legislature or regulatory agency would enact sweeping rules that create such economic chaos, shutter entire industries, and cause thousands of people to lose their jobs. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]