Search for: "The People v. Russell"
Results 381 - 400
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Jonathan Litman- requires pro bono service prior to the bar makes life difficult for students but is a good policy ; California takes lead on Civil Gideon. 10:53- 3 good arguments for expanding civil gideon: 1) we will all save money if other people get counsel 2) protecting rule of law is good for business and consumers 3) strengthen our own best selves. 10:54- Justice is JUST – US 10:55- Panel 1: Russell Engler, Rebecca Sandefur, Mark… [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 7:45 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
In Kisor v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
” Russell disagreed that the airline’s report was only “slightly” different from the truth, noting that “this Court has used ‘mentally unstable’ as a shorthand for describing people who are subject to involuntary commitment, and people who are barred by federal law from owning a gun. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution, and False Claims Act case Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
Russell Sandberg has posted about the debate here. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
A semi-truck driver was unfortunately killed and three other people were hurt in a recent collision between two big rigs on Interstate 75. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:24 pm
Doe I and Cargill v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution, the justices could “put some teeth into Batson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
” Horvitz & Levy’s At the Lectern blog notes that the justices also declined to review “the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
“ Tzystuck v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
When the Supreme Court issues decisions like it did in Bowles v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
When the Supreme Court issues decisions like it did in Bowles v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:18 am
This should only be when there has been an incidence of domestic violence but people often resort to this extreme measure out of vitriol for the other parent. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:43 am
” J.S.A. v. [read post]
