Search for: "The People v. Walker" Results 61 - 80 of 783
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 10:38 am
Kischassey, bicycles without motors are not considered vehicles, and in People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 10:13 am
So I know many people will find it hard to root for either side.But it's also a very interesting patent and antitrust dispute, and for those in the hard core intellectual property field, a definite must read. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
So said the lessor-plaintiffs in Walker v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:15 am by Adam
The Human Element of The Walking Dead Even more interesting than interactions with the walkers, the show focuses in on the interaction between people. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Walker v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
As to this latter question, the Court’s answer was “yes”, Lord Walker dissenting. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  The first oral argument was in Walker v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm?”. [read post]