Search for: "The Rachel v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm by Alyson Carney
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am by CMS
In this post, Rachel Free (Partner), Toby Sears (Partner) and Omri Shirion (Associate) of the CMS Intellectual Property team, preview the UK Supreme Court’s upcoming hearing of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Similarly, there are no territorial limits on the federal government's jurisdiction within the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:30 am by Joel R. Brandes
      In Pfeiffer v Bachotet, 2019 WL 190927 (11thCir., 2019) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a judgment of the district court which denied the petition of Plaintiff-Petitioner Marcellinus Pfeiffer, who sought the return of his children N.A.R. and R.H.E. from the United States to Switzerland. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:00 am by Eric Goldman
  The United States District Court for the District of Utah, however, denied Xcentric’s motion. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:26 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent-Appellee Meschiya Rachel Lake-Harm was a citizen of the United States, currently living in New Orleans, Louisiana. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:26 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent-Appellee Meschiya Rachel Lake-Harm was a citizen of the United States, currently living in New Orleans, Louisiana. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Nelson Tebbe & Micah Schwartzman, The Politics of Proportionality,  (120 Michigan Law Review 1307 (2022)).Guy Baldwin, The Coronavirus Pandemic and Religious Freedom: Judicial Decisions in the United States and United Kingdom, ((2022) Judicial Review).Christopher Mills, Blake Davis & Richard Osborne, Is Viability Dicta? [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
”In response, the Smiths filed claims against the landlord in the United States District Court of Colorado alleging wrongful discrimination predicated upon sexual identity, familial status, and sexual orientation.After a motion for summary judgment, the court found the owner liable for discrimination in violation of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA). [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:49 pm by Firemark Law Team
  Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/122 “THE ROOM WHERE IT HAPPENED” MOVES TOWARDS PUBLICATIONUnited States of America v John R. [read post]