Search for: "The Richmond v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
“ Thurgood Marshall in 1957 On September 15, 1959, Boynton filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
“ Thurgood Marshall in 1957 On September 15, 1959, Boynton filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
In addition, the White Oak Agreement forum selection clause states:“Both parties hereto agree…to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia located in Richmond, Virginia, in any litigation between the parties or, if the federal court lacks jurisdiction, the state courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia located in Henrico County, Virginia…contractor hereby waives any… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:57 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The United States and California Constitutions require that the condemnation of private property must be for a “public use." [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The cases below were referred to in the Court’s judgment: – Halford v the United Kingdom (25 June 1997), which concerned an office landline designated for personal use. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 pm by Ken Lammers
These things can be written about by every other citizen in the United States, just not Horace. [read post]
Case date: 26 January 2021 Case number: No. 19-2390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 11:43 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Richmond were charging a fee per lettable unit which amounted in Mr Gaskin’s case to £1799. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 3:00 pm
On Tuesday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Heidi Meinzer
PHH removed the matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, and moved to dismiss the action under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. [read post]