Search for: "The Richmond v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Robert Margolis
Case date: 01 August 2019 Case number: No. 18-1477 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:13 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and argues that “[w]hat’s at stake in this case is whether the justices will… make it easier for prosecutors to pursue certain types of insider trading claims. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am by newgenblog
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 6:39 am by Valerie Brennan
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Decision of 9 July 2012, No. 11-3920, Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 6:39 am by Valerie Brennan
When Can A Franchisee Continue United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Decision of 9 July 2012, No. 11-3920, Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In her scholarly paper, Professor Hodges proposes instituting a negotiation or bargaining requirement into employment contracts in order to protect employee rights in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s recent Epic Systems v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
The covenant itself must only prohibit competitive activity requiring the use of trade secrets. -- Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Opinion Date: 7/1/11 Cite: Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 5:32 pm
Cargill, AFPD (Roanoke)B.S. 1978 United States Military Academy (2nd in class)J.D. 1984 University of Virginia1985-1991 U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Driver's Momentary Stop Not Submission to Police Authority for Fourth Amendment Seizure United States, appellee v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 6:56 am by Patricia Salkin
Morrow v City of San Diego, 2017 WL 3131547 (SD CA 7/21/2017)Filed under: Equal Protection [read post]