Search for: "The Southwark" Results 21 - 40 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
Briefly, Mr Hanoman was a Southwark secure tenant. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
The ramifications of Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report) rumble on. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:32 am by S
Moreover, Southwark also conceded that if he was street homeless, and on his own, then he would be more likely to suffer harm or injury than the ordinary homeless person.However, Southwark also took into account the support that Mr Hotak received from his brother. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:32 am by S
Moreover, Southwark also conceded that if he was street homeless, and on his own, then he would be more likely to suffer harm or injury than the ordinary homeless person.However, Southwark also took into account the support that Mr Hotak received from his brother. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr AA was Southwark’s secure tenant. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
Mr Allen was a Southwark tenant. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 3:16 pm by Giles Peaker
XC, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark (2017) EWHC 736 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Southwark’s allocation policy as it applied to transfers. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:17 am by J
In a subsequent case involving Southwark (LB Southwark v Woelke), the LVT had found that Southwark hadn’t demanded service charges in accordance with the lease, such that nothing was owing. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:17 am by J
In a subsequent case involving Southwark (LB Southwark v Woelke), the LVT had found that Southwark hadn’t demanded service charges in accordance with the lease, such that nothing was owing. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by NL
The tenancy agreement was not amended or supplemented by Southwark. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by NL
The tenancy agreement was not amended or supplemented by Southwark. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:35 am by Giles Peaker
Southwark accepted that the household was statutorily overcrowded. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:07 am
Southwark had made an erroneous decision on Mr Mendes’ eligibility for housing assistance under Part VII. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
Therefore the s.20 duty had arisen and Southwark could not side step it. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Mr Francis was a tenant of the London Borough of Southwark. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Mr Francis was a tenant of the London Borough of Southwark. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
The DWP told Southwark, who then found he had been overpaid £1000 HB etc. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 11:30 am by Giles Peaker
The post Job ads – Wandsworth, Southwark, Birmingham, Hammersmith appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 11:15 am by Giles Peaker
Southwark found he was not in priority need in a s.184 decision. [read post]