Search for: "Thom Lambert"
Results 21 - 40
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
If cat cafes really do spread to the United States, perhaps it will lead New York City to rethink its misguided regulations barring dogs from bars, which I wrote about here: As Thom Lambert points out, this is a ridiculous regulation. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:52 pm
UPDATE: Additional thoughts from Thom Lambert and Megan McArdle. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Putting together a list of all law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:50 am
Sincerely, Thom Lambert Professor of Law University of Missouri Law School Columbia, Missouri Filed under: constitutional law, health care reform debate [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:08 pm
Bad idea [Mark Calabria/Cato, The Economist, Thom Lambert] NYT, Reuters misreport effect of Stand Your Ground laws [Jacob Sullum, Robert VerBruggen/NRO, earlier here, etc.] [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
More on the “MarburyGate” presidential gaffe from Thom Lambert and David Bernstein. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:02 pm
UPDATE: Former Obama Student Thom Lambert: My Professor, My Judge, and the Doctrine of Judicial Review. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:44 pm
Professor Thom Lambert likewise opines that: But to say that current insider trading rules generally don’t reach trades by members of Congress is not to imply that congressional staffers are free to trade on material non-public information they acquire in the course of their jobs. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:06 pm
” [James Huffman, Defining Ideas] Obama’s high court appointees are fortunately friendlier toward civil liberties than he is [Steve Chapman] Unanimous Cal Supremes: companies not legally responsible for other companies’ asbestos products used as replacement for theirs [Cal Biz Lit, Jackson, Beck, Mass Tort Prof] Claim: jurors considered policy implications of verdict and you can’t have that [On Point; defense verdict in Baltimore, Maryland school-bullying case] … [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:06 am
And Thom Lambert asks: “What if the Government Ordered the Human Rights Campaign to Cover Conversion Therapy for Gays? [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:19 am
Thom Lambert Although I didn’t know him as well as some of my co-bloggers did, Larry very much influenced my own development as an academic. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:09 pm
[LATimes, Adler] “Overcriminalization: The Legislative Side of the Problem” [Larkin/Heritage, related Meese] When feds spring false-statements trap, it won’t matter whether you committed underlying offense being investigated [Popehat] “‘Clean Up Government Act’ sparks overcriminalization concerns” [PoL] Former Attorney General Mukasey on ObamaCare recusal flap [Adler] American Antitrust Institute proposals might be discounted given group’s… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:14 am
[Report; website] Thom Lambert is skeptical of the American Antitrust Institute's jury instruction project, given that institution's poor track record in favoring plaintiffs' lawyers over consumers. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:12 am
Eric Helland, Thom Lambert, Larry Ribstein, Paul Rubin, Mike Sykuta, J.W. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Thom Lambert remarks upon a law professor conundrum: you submit an article, accept an offer from Law Review A, and then higher ranked Law Review B makes you an offer. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
Thom Lambert at Truth on the Market detects the symptoms of regulatory “capture. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 10:13 pm
And community is undermined as a result, argues Thom Lambert at Truth on the Market. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:40 pm
Only service dogs are permitted in spaces that serve food or drink of any kind.As Thom Lambert points out, this is a ridiculous regulation. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Daniel Sokol Thom Lambert (Missouri Law) has posted Appropriate Liability Rules for Tying and Bundled Discounting: A Response to Professor Elhauge. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Daniel Sokol Thom Lambert (Missouri Law) has posted Appropriate Liability Rules for Tying and Bundled Discounting: A Response to Professor Elhauge. [read post]
