Search for: "Thom Lambert"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
Thom Lambert has a post with material by Professor Richard Epstein of University of Chicago Law School on Barack Obama's time at the UofC, which comes from the WSJ by way of Reason TV:Epstein: The difference between them [Bush and Obama], which is why Obama is the more dangerous man ultimately, is he has very little by way of a skill set to understand the complex problems he wants to address, but he has this unbounded confidence in himself.Reason: So he’s the perfect… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
Todd Zywicki and I recently filed (along with Keith Hylton, Fred McChesney, and TOTM’s own Thom Lambert) an amicus brief in support of certiorari in a Fifth Circuit Tobacco Master Settlement Case. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:04 pm
Manne, Interesting Doesn’t Necessarily Mean Policy Relevant Thom Lambert, Behavioral Economics and the Conflicting Quirks Problem: A “Realist” Critique Christopher Sprigman & Christopher Buccafusco, Valuing Intellectual Property Judd E. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:11 am
I took Professor Sunstein’s Elements class with my friend and co-contributor Thom Lambert, and I remember being a part of some of the early classroom experiments in the field. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:31 pm
Manne, Interesting Doesn’t Necessarily Mean Policy Relevant Thom Lambert, Behavioral Economics and the Conflicting Quirks Problem: A “Realist” Critique Christopher Sprigman & Christopher Buffafusco, Valuing Intellectual Property Judd E. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Thom Lambert is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri Behavioralism is mesmerizing. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
Thom Lambert recently discussed it: A hallmark of Austrian thinking, especially as articulated by F.A. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
THOM LAMBERT: Must the President Defend Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:16 pm
Thom Lambert offers an affirmative answer to the titular question and is kind enough to add that: More from Professor Bainbridge here and here. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Adler) There’s more on apparent insider trading on Capitol Hill from Deal Journal, Thom Lambert, and Professor Bainbridge. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:06 am
Here also are some comments by Lambert, David Zaring (and here), and Stefan Padfield. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:36 am
Here also are some comments by Lambert, David Zaring (and here), and Stefan Padfield. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:30 am
Daniel Sokol Thom Lambert (Missouri Law) describes The Roberts Court and the Limits of Antitrust. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:30 am
Daniel Sokol Thom Lambert (Missouri Law) describes The Roberts Court and the Limits of Antitrust. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 9:16 pm
I've been reflecting on some observations made by Thom Lambert and Josh Wright at a recent conference on the Roberts Court's business cases (more about that here). [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
I'm back from Case Western, which held a conference on the Roberts Court's business law, with papers from Matt Bodie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Thom Lambert, and Adam Pritchard, and commentary from a cast of worthies. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:59 am
Thom Lambert has a thoughtful, provocative post over at Truth on the Market on the financial crisis and financial reform in which he argues that the root of the financial crisis was a bubble and that a systemic risk regulator looks like the wrong solution. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
Daniel Sokol I use [first name] /2 [last name] and AFT(1999) as my search term in the JLR data base for US law professors (except in the case of Thom Lambert because where I went with the... [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
Daniel Sokol I use [first name] /2 [last name] and AFT(1999) as my search term in the JLR data base for US law professors (except in the case of Thom Lambert because where I went with the... [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:46 pm
As Lambert J.A. says in Robertson at 388: …But the remarks made in the course of the reasons in Hawitt v. [read post]
