Search for: "Thomas v. Gay" Results 1 - 20 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 11:45 am by Joe Patrice
Karlan, Politics, Rick Jacobs, SCOTUS, Shelby County, Supreme Court, Thomas Saenz, Vance v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
" The speakers, whom Dale properly characterizes as a "strong group of conservative intellectuals and gay-marriage experts," are:Gerard V. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
” Apparently, Thomas’ objection to punishing gays and lesbians for private, consensual sodomy is that other crimes deserve more attention, not that gays and lesbians have a right to enjoy private, consensual intimacy.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm by David Lat & Elie Mystal
University of Texas, Gay, Gay Marriage, Gay Rights, History, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:34 pm by Above the Law
Valeo, campaign finance, David Lat, Gay Marriage, Health Care / Medicine, Infographics, McCullen v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
The dissenters were Chief Justice William Rehnquist, and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas joined all of those cases except Texas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Gorsuch shared Thomas’ views, but also wrote a separate opinion supported by Thomas seeking to answer the two dissenting Justices. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:54 am by NCC Staff
The dissenters were Chief Justice William Rehnquist, and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
The dissenters were Chief Justice William Rehnquist, and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:27 pm
A unanimous court eventually broadened the ability of death-penalty defendants to blame someone else for the crime.That was Holmes v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:56 am by Danielle & Andy
As gay, lesbian, and other proponents of same-sex marriages celebrate the United States Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]