Search for: "Thomas v. Sierra Club"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2008, 9:22 am
Duncan sued defendants, including the Sierra Club, based on Thomas Cohen and Kristi Cohen's attempts to make a film of Duncan's book The River Why. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:33 pm
” Thomas and Sotomayor both asked why Sierra Club wants to see draft biological opinions regarding an EPA rule that no longer exists. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:07 pm
See Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Sierra Club is an eye-opening example. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
The Court’s decision overturns the project’s federal approval and returns the issue to FERC to complete the necessary greenhouse gas analysis (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 1:25 pm
Sierra Club, Inc. was not unanimous. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm
See Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
Warning, and both found standing for opposition groups’ challenge to an environmental delisting petition in Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:51 am
Sierra Club, Wolf v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 1:48 pm
Sierra Club, No. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am
This standard would turn every nonprofit in the country into a commercial speaker and give the government enormous power to regulate the speech of every nonprofit, from the Sierra Club to the Catholic Church. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:06 pm
Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680, 686 (1983) (a case involving the Clean Air Act, not ERISA), held that “a fees claimant must show some degree of success on the merits. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
S. 166, 175 (1974); Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
” See Thomas Jefferson Univ., 512 U.S. at 512 (deferring to “an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
” See Thomas Jefferson Univ., 512 U.S. at 512 (deferring to “an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:06 pm
Sierra Club (1983), which established a more lenient fee-shifting standard that would allow a party to recover as long as it “achiev[ed] some success” on the merits. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
