Search for: "Thomas B. Griffith"
Results 21 - 40
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 2:02 pm
" [B.] [read post]
5 May 2020, 8:35 pm
Judge Thomas Griffith began service on the D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
Primero, en Griffith v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Judge Thomas Griffith wrote for the court, with Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson concurring. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:48 pm
Writing on behalf of the court, Judge Thomas B. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
In the McGahn oral argument, Judge Thomas Griffith, an appointee of George W. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Judges Judith Rogers, David Tatel and Thomas Griffith reviewed Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri’s (“Al-Nashiri”) request for a writ of mandamus and prohibition directing the vacatur of the orders convening the military commission which tried him. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 11:46 am
LEGAL RESEARCH AND LIBRARIES John B. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Even though the regulation in question was directed at vehicle manufacturers, not biofuel manufacturers, Kavanaugh (joined by Tatel and Judge Cornelia Pillard) found standing: If the Government prohibits or impedes Company A from using Company B’s product, does Company B have standing to sue? [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Also on the site is a review of Behemoth: A History of the Factory and the Making of the Modern World by Joshua B. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 6:29 am
Rogers, Thomas B. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Judge Thomas B. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:39 am
Rogers-appointed by President Clinton Judge Thomas B. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
Houston, Phillip B. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
Houston, Phillip B. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:18 pm
In an August 1, 2017 opinion written by Judge Thomas B. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm
Judge Thomas B. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 11:41 am
The opinion was written by Judge Thomas B. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:34 am
Circuit Judge Thomas B. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am
Because, Judge Thomas Griffith penned, “[b]y its clear terms, this provision strips federal courts of jurisdiction to hear most claims against the United States arising out of the detention of aliens like Jawad captured during the United States’ invasion of Afghanistan,” and because the CSRT satisfied the §7(a), the court could not intervene. [read post]
