Search for: "Thomas Baer" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:37 am by Guest Author
  Professor Thomas Merrill, who worked as Deputy Solicitor General during Chevron’s formulative years, has argued that the Justice Department played a major part in making Chevron into an “accidental landmark. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Alvarez took this view: Justices Breyer and Kagan in the concurrence and Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas in the dissent. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:09 am by Christopher J. Walker
Several of the conservative justices, including in particular Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, may be receptive to the argument. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 8:17 am by InhouseBlog
Robert Thomas (Michigan) Sponsors: Journal of Corporation Law, the Georgetown Institute for the Study of Market Ethics, and Wharton’s Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research The symposiasts will be hosted by Georgetown Law, with audience members participating via Zoom. [read post]
8 May 2021, 6:54 am by Tia Sewell
And Nicol Turner Lee shared this week’s episode of TechTank, featuring a conversation with MIT Professor Nancy Rose and Brookings Fellows Bill Baer and Tom Wheeler on the Biden administration’s potential approach to antitrust regulation and Big Tech: And that was the week that was. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
" Chief Justice Max Baer's majority (joined by Justices Thomas Saylor, Debra Todd, Kevin Dougherty, and Sallie Updyke Mundy) concluded that the interception prohibition didn't apply: [A]bsent demonstrable circumstances to the contrary, we believe it is objectively reasonable to conclude that persons in Appellee's position do not have a justifiable expectation that their oral communications will not be subject to interception while they are in a child's… [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Instead, the 6-1 Majority in Hammons, with Chief Justice Thomas G. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[We've filed a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Tennessee Supreme Court to review the case.] [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
”Dougherty was joined by Justices Max Baer, Christine Donohue and David Wecht.The three Justices on the Supreme Court that could not agree with the Majority’s decision included Chief Justice Thomas Saylor, Justice Debra Todd, and Justice Sallie Updyke Mundy.In her Dissenting Opinion, Justice Mundy, joined by Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Todd, contended that “the discharge of a weapon during a physical altercation initiated by the insured, while the insured is… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:04 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
Nadine Garcia, the executive vice president of Trust for America's Health; Christopher Neuwirth, the assistant commissioner for public health infrastructure, laboratories and emergency preparedness in the New Jersey Department of Public Health; and Thomas Dobbs, a state health officer in the Mississippi State Department of Health. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:39 am by Mitu Gulati
And if Griesa/Baer are right that the bond continues to have legal vitality even after the awarding of a judgment, is this really so far-fetched? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 10:58 am by Mitu Gulati
  The judges were Harold Baer and Thomas Griesa, both cases were at the trial court level, and both cases both involved my favorite clause, pari passu. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:07 am
Even former CIA official Robert Baer, no friend of Trump, said as much in an early confab on CNN with Brooke Baldwin... [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]