Search for: "Thomas More Law Center v. Obama"
Results 241 - 260
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part, calling the decision “an unprecedented departure from our deferential review of discretionary agency decisions. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Individual Rights Foundation (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of The American Legion (in support of petitioners) Brief amici curiae of Alliance Defense Fund and Thomas More Law Center (in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-1234 Title:… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am
Those two officials are also surely far more sophisticated about FISA than is Whitaker (as I have pointed out, he has said that Marbury v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Energy Safety Servs., Inc., No. 08-1013*ADA - Whether driving is a major life activityØ SCOTUS docket hereØ Noted here: Adjunct Law ProfØ * Petition denied 4-6-09Oakley v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
The second move made by my progressive interlocutors is more serious, and much, much more dismaying. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Justice Kennedy, generally the Court’s ideological center, early on asked: “I understand we must presume laws are constitutional, but even so, when you are changing the relation of the individual to the government in this, what we can stipulate is, I think, a unique way, do you not have a heavy burden of justification to show the authorization under the Constitution” – a question straight out of the Tea Party playbook. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
However, as the “Levinsonfest” proceeds, I find myself more and more overwhelmed by gratitude to everyone who is participating. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
And [Clarence] Thomas is much more conservative than people thought he’d be. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
Although the details remain to be spelled out, the immediate effect of an unconstitutional retroactive court packing law, disguised as a term limits law, would be to remove as voting members of the Supreme Court, on cases before that Court, three out of the six of the moderate, libertarian, and conservative Republican-appointed current life-tenured Supreme Court Justices who have served for more than eighteen years: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence… [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
The surplus of constitutional meaning means that new claims can enter the center from the margins (think of marriage equality, though also of gun rights). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
See Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Although President Barack Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland in March 2016 to take Scalia’s place, Garland’s nomination went nowhere, and Neil Gorsuch, a judge on the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Thus, the cases are far larger and more complex. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 9:12 am
And actually the case at that time was called Lynch v. [read post]
