Search for: "Thomas More Law Center v. Obama" Results 121 - 140 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
When Barack Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court in 2010, Kagan approached the Senate hearings in a highly respectful manner, notwithstanding her previous sharp criticism. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
  On the hold front, it appears the Court is holding Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
At the First Amendment Center, Tony Mauro reflects on two recently granted cases—Commission on Ethics of the State of Nevada v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  Politics is also more familiar and therefore more accessible to the public than are court decisions. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
”  At the Berkley Center’s Cornerstone blog, Thomas Berg notes that questions relating to the impact of the decision on religious liberty “were not directly before the Court, so unsurprisingly it said relatively little about them. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  The Sixth Circuit recently recognized this in its ruling upholding the ACA against novel Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment challenges in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog will publish over the next several weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of that law. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:38 am by Marissa Miller
” Finally, as the school’s website reports, Georgetown University Law Center hosted a mock moot court of the health care case last week, with Walter Dellinger and Steven Bradbury as the advocates. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by Robert Kraft
Thomas said the court was bound by the principle that federal law trumps the states and by relevant US regulations. [read post]