Search for: "Thomas v. Holt" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:05 am by ernst
  Signers include James McPherson, Nell Painter, Vernon Burton, Manisha Sinha, Steve Hahn, and Thomas Holt. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:16 am by Eugene Volokh
O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006) (win for religious exemption from the federal drug law banning hoasca, a hallucinogen) and Holt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by Eugene Volokh
O Centro, which involved a small religious group's use of the hallucinogenic drug hoasca, and Holt v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am by Stephen Sachs
In the Supreme Court's recent standing decision, Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 10:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The conventional wisdom may be that Justice Gorsuch is more likely to be a "cross-over" vote than Justice Alito, but the latter authored an important RLUIPA decision (Holt v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
Bremerton School District, Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh highlighted two harmful free-exercise precedents that merit reconsideration. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Holt, 18-5781, all raise the same issue: whether a federal prisoner may file a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. [read post]