Search for: "Thomas v. Jones*#"
Results 21 - 40
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 12:28 pm
As we reported, here, Magistrate Judge Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr. from the EDVA dismissed a series of federal DUI cases after the accuseds in the cases were previously taken to NJP and provided deficient NJP advice, in Magistrate Jones’ opinion, regarding the election to accept NJP. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:02 am
From ScotusBlog: Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 19, 2014. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
DiNardo, who is a partner at Jones Day. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
DiNardo, who is a partner at Jones Day. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:41 pm
Jones, 61 M.J. 80 (C.A.A.F. 2005) and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:43 pm
Justice Ginsburg wrote for Justice Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm
SCOTUS decided United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:24 am
Jones. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:21 am
Jones had a very good draw (good for him, anyway, and bad for the Arizona Attorney General) and got three Democratic appointees: one from Carter (Betty Fletcher) and two from Clinton (Hawkins and Thomas). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
Jones. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 8:14 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
The memos came as a result of the Supreme Court decision in the Jones v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The opinion in the consolidated cases of Jones v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
Attacks on the guilt determination have been uniformly rejected.In the Jones case, Judge Sidney Thomas adds annoyance to error by consistently referring to the murderer as "Danny." [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am
I myself am more open to campaign contribution limits than he (or his former boss, Justice Thomas) is; I explain my thinking briefly in this article, which shows me to be one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
