Search for: "Thomas v. Jones*#" Results 121 - 140 of 655
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News   No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times   One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Matt Barnum considers whether Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” In Mother Jones, Nathalie Baptiste discusses Ayestas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
12:00 – 12:30 PM Lunch, Knowles Conference Center, Georgia State Law 12:30 – 1:30 PM Keynote Address: Camara Jones, MD, MPH, PhD, Immediate Past President, American Public Health AssociationAchieving Health Equity: Tools for a National Campaign Against Racism 1:30 – 1:45 PM Break 1:45 – 3:15 PM Concurrent Sessions 2Health Care Financing and Regulation Session 2A – Room 341Antitrust, False Claims Act, and HSAsModerator: Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on this week’s decision by the court to send Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 5:50 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Estas vías de indagación tienen el potencial de nutrir una teoría analítica, una teoría normativa, una teoría de interpretación y una teoría social del silencio en el derecho. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
When Jones requested the return of his French newspaper, Webster made a copy for himself and had it certified by James Kent on 22 May. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
Thomas Massie (R-KY), argued that Congress did not delegate to the State Department the power to “regulate domestic public speech,” and further that the State Department’s reading of the law would chill innovation. [read post]