Search for: "Thomas v. Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2025, 1:20 pm
That, he says, should have informed the City that he probably didn't receive notice of the tickets, so additional efforts at notice were required under Jones before his property was seized.Judge Thomas responds to that argument on the next-to-last page of her opinion. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
The House of Lords debated Lord Clement Jones’s Private Members Bill, which aims to set out a legislative framework for the responsible use of algorithmic and automated decision-making systems in the public sector. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 1:30 pm
(See Thomas Davies's work.) [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
Technically, the court instructed the lower courts to review the case in light of the recent decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
On Tuesday 15 October 2024 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the data protection case of Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In recent years, Justice Thomas, later joined by Justice Gorsuch, has suggested that NY Times v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 am
” Judge Allison Jones Rushing concurred saying, “The handgun license requirement is nevertheless constitutional because it is consistent with the principles underlying our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:06 am
Exactly: see, for example, Sterling v Rand & Anor [2019] EWHC 2560 (Ch) and Kohn v Wagschal & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1022: we’ve previously discussed the issue here. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am
Jones, 234 N.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm
On Wednesday 17 July 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Jones Nickolds v Pearce. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"[A] government entity that does not supply any record in response to a FOIL request 'shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be found after diligent search' " (Matter of Thomas v Kane, 203 AD3d 1487, 1489 [3d Dept 2022], quoting Public Officers Law § 89 [3] [a]). [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
On 3 July 2024, judgment was handed down by HHJ Parkes in the strike out application of Pacini & Anor v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [2024] EWHC 1709 (KB). [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
Stone, Sex and the Constitution (2017) Suja Thomas, The Missing American Jury (2016) Thomas G. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:55 pm
Jones and Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc and others, 17 June 2024 (Steyn J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) MBR Acres v FREE THE [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:39 am
Today the Supreme Court decided Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am
Europe The case of Danilet v. [read post]
