Search for: "Thomas v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
Rogers, 281 U. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
” Rhode v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 7:22 am
Rogers, Kate Mackintosh (@Katemackintosh2) and Maksym Popov Global Democracy The Democratic Price of Countering Authoritarianism by Thomas Carothers Political Prisoners / Russia A Lawyer for Political Prisoners on Why He Fled Russia by Vadim Prokhorov U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Conde Nast chief executive Roger Lynch has warned that “many” media companies could go out of business in the time it would take for litigation against generative AI companies to pass through the courts. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Thomas of Maryland, “safe to be trusted with the destinies of a great nation and of an injured and magnanimous people. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the Ninth Circuit was wrong in concluding that the toy was entitled to First Amendment protection under Rogers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
In summary, the court ruled that the exclusion of Lanham Act liability, established by the Second Circuit precedent (Rogers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Also, Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurring opinion (joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett) which said that “it is not entirely clear where the Rogers test comes from,” “it is not obvious that Rogers is correct in all its particulars,” and “serious questions” were raised about the test. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
