Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Both cases seek to address the issue of whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act must first raise an issue before the Social Security Administration (SSA) if they wish to raise that issue on a judicial review of the SSA’s final decision. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:11 pm
Related blog posts: The Outcome of Your Social Security Disability Claim Often Depends on the Personality of the ALJ Who Decides Your Case Social Security Disability and Retirement 101 A Good Social Security Attorney Provides a Roadmap for the Judge: Diaz v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am by David Super
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by David Friedman
In a recent post, based on a WSJ piece by Thomas Saving, I pointed out some implications of the status of the Social Security Trust Fund. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am by Ronald Mann
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
Securities and Exchange Commission, they were well aware of the implications the decision holds for the administrative state. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 7:28 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Saul, that the lower court improperly imposed an issue-exhaustion requirement on Social Security benefit claimants who had sought to press Appointments Clause challenges against Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judges in the wake of Lucia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Thomas does not believe that politics in any sense of that term — electoral politics, social movements, state action and regulation, organizing, even more radical notions of transformative change — can positively affect black people; he thinks politics mostly hurts black people. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
" As experienced Social Security disability attorneys who have represented thousands of disability benefits claimants in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, we know all too well that sometimes the Social Security Administration (SSA), its experts and even its judges just plain get it wrong. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Berin Szóka, Corbin Barthold
Their editorial judgments fall “squarely within the core of First Amendment security,” wrote the Miami Herald court. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
For example, although Glenn had qualified for permanent Social Security disability benefits, MetLife ignored the findings of the Social Security Administration in deciding to deny her claim. [read post]