Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 221 - 240 of 357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Rene Blocker reports on American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
President Thomas Jefferson and Marbury v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Circuit Approval of the Constitutionality of SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Adam S. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Congress, this administration, and our main regulator the FCC view broadband employment/adoption as a principal goal. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court ordered the records in question produced for an in camera* inspection by the court and subsequently directed DOE to disclose the investigative file concerning “Office of Special Investigation Case 08-4247” except for certain pages, with any Social Security numbers redacted from such files. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Professor Gibson’s comprehensive history of the Court waves together the legal history of the Red River with its social, economic and political history. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  David Fontaine is Executive Vice President, Chief Legal & Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of Altegrity, a privately held company that among other entities, owns Kroll’s data breach response services. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm by Kevin Johnson
Before the Supreme Court, the Obama administration took a firm position and relied heavily on two Cold-War-era decisions that immigration law professors love to hate: Knauff v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
So how do we get tech companies to start fighting surveillance in court, hardening their systems against surveillance, pushing back against the administration, and lobbying for real reform? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
  Two justices (Scalia and Thomas) questioned the amount of deference properly afforded administrative interpretations in situations “that contemplate[] both criminal and administrative enforcement. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Appellant had not exhausted all administrative remedies, so the district court dismissed his complaint. [read post]