Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 301 - 320 of 338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H.… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
This is crazy.This extreme malapportionment of the Senate also has real effects: Clarence Thomas would not be on the Supreme Court if the Senate were apportioned according to population. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
But Socialism and Palinism alike are masks for the true Conspiracy, which has persecuted SubGenii for possibly thousands of years. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
But Socialism and Palinism alike are masks for the true Conspiracy, which has persecuted SubGenii for possibly thousands of years. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:30 pm by A. Benjamin Spencer
Here is an excerpt from the Syllabus:Respondent Ratliff was Ruby Kills Ree’s attorney in Ree’s successful suit against the United States Social Security Administration for Social Security benefits. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Renee Newman Knake
  (Here, Attorney Ratliff prevailed on a claim for social security benefits wrongfully denied to her client, and was awarded fees of $2,112.60, all of which will now go to offset her client's federal debt.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
 Garland also had the support of senior administration officials from the Reagan Justice Department, as well as that of Judge Laurence Silberman, who was appointed to the D.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
As a consequence, the appointment of Stevens’ successor by a Democratic President with a Democratic Senate is unlikely to shift the Court’s rulings on most important social issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, religion, and gay rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
  I do, but fully anticipate that future Republican administration lawyers will face similar pressures to those of the Bush administration. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
The most desirable outcome in both schemes is for the parties to come to an agreement which reduces transaction, administrative, and social costs. [read post]