Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 61 - 80 of 339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Both cases seek to address the issue of whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act must first raise an issue before the Social Security Administration (SSA) if they wish to raise that issue on a judicial review of the SSA’s final decision. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Technology, Social Media, and Professional Ethics, 45 University of Dayton Law Review 63 (2020). 287 Media Appearances Quoted in Impeachment Trial, Divisive Cases Hang Over Chief Justice, Law360 (Jan. 1, 2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
Trump falsely linked Section 230 to national security, but no one believed it. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Old Norms and New Challenges in Spain’s Response to COVID-19 May 20, 2020 | Susana de la Sierra, University of Castilla-La Mancha The complex legal, social, and political realities of Spain’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic may share many aspects in common with regulatory responses in other jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
Some justices were clearly concerned that striking down the removal restrictions could have significant and undesirable ripple effects – calling into question, for example, the validity of the Social Security Administration’s leadership structure. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
Saul, 20-105, both involve an issue of particular concern given the court’s recent interest in separation of powers: whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act forfeits an appointments clause challenge to the appointment of the administrative law judge overseeing his or her case by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Writing in dissent, Judge Thomas Durkin wrote that Alvarenga-Flores’s overall narrative had remained c [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:45 am by fjhinojosa
Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence V. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The action involves patients at a maximum security health centre between 1966-1983, by patients in the Social Therapy Unit (STU) involving controversial treatment that included mind-altering drugs, isolation cells, hallucinogenic drugs, and a strict disciplinary regime, Tactics included verbally aggressive communication and patient-on-patient p [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” While it acknowledged the examples cited by supporters of the CFPB, such as the single Administrator of the Social Security Administration (SSA) and sole officer of the Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), the Court concluded that the examples are relatively recent and extremely controversial. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
” The New York Times v CIA No.18-2112-cv, concerning whether national security cases which the president had tweeted about, brings the information at issue for FOIA requests. [read post]