Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 101 - 120 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Twitter has launched a browser game designed to teach users about its privacy settings. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
Writing alone, Justice Thomas argued that social media platforms have unprecedented private control over speech, including speech by government actors. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”) has released for public comment “Draft Measures on Security Assessment of Cross-border Data Transfer” (“Draft Measures”). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
”  Finally, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes “unmistakable comparisons to the court’s action on the Social Security Act of 1935” (which the Court upheld in a pair of cases in 1937). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareTuesday’s argument in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  In this respect, the Act resembles the Social Security Act, with one very important difference—namely, that the ACA offers employers greater discretion, a choice, about how to satisfy that social obligation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
Law as a social system : legal anthropology course director, Susan Drummond. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm by Kevin Johnson
Before the Supreme Court, the Obama administration took a firm position and relied heavily on two Cold-War-era decisions that immigration law professors love to hate: Knauff v. [read post]