Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 101 - 120 of 363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
Some justices were clearly concerned that striking down the removal restrictions could have significant and undesirable ripple effects – calling into question, for example, the validity of the Social Security Administration’s leadership structure. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
Saul, 20-105, both involve an issue of particular concern given the court’s recent interest in separation of powers: whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act forfeits an appointments clause challenge to the appointment of the administrative law judge overseeing his or her case by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Writing in dissent, Judge Thomas Durkin wrote that Alvarenga-Flores’s overall narrative had remained c [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:45 am by fjhinojosa
Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence V. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The action involves patients at a maximum security health centre between 1966-1983, by patients in the Social Therapy Unit (STU) involving controversial treatment that included mind-altering drugs, isolation cells, hallucinogenic drugs, and a strict disciplinary regime, Tactics included verbally aggressive communication and patient-on-patient p [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” While it acknowledged the examples cited by supporters of the CFPB, such as the single Administrator of the Social Security Administration (SSA) and sole officer of the Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), the Court concluded that the examples are relatively recent and extremely controversial. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
” The New York Times v CIA No.18-2112-cv, concerning whether national security cases which the president had tweeted about, brings the information at issue for FOIA requests. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Remember that day’s Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
EPA Assistant Administrator Susan Parker Bodine explained that the timing of the reversal stems from the lifting of coronavirus social distancing restrictions. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
Out of further administrative review options, Thuraissigiam filed a habeas petition in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
As described above, by virtue of receiving deferred action, the 700,000 DACA recipients may request work authorization and are eligible for Social Security and Medicare. [read post]