Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 121 - 140 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The second episode of Media Law Podcast has a debate between Dr Thomas Bennett and Dr Paul Wragg under the title “Invasion of Privacy – What’s the harm? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Capato, in which the Court will consider whether a child who was conceived after the death of a biological parent, but who cannot inherit personal property from that biological parent under applicable state intestacy law, is eligible for child survivor benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 1:58 am by INFORRM
China The Cyberspace Administration of China and the Ministry of Public Security has jointly released the Security Management Measures for the Application of Facial Recognition Technology, which will become effective on 1 June 2025. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
  Two justices (Scalia and Thomas) questioned the amount of deference properly afforded administrative interpretations in situations “that contemplate[] both criminal and administrative enforcement. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm by Gene Takagi
Lee, supra, at 259-260; and no “less restrictive means,” see Thomas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Dingemans LJ set out five factors which together in his view meant that the continuation of the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and that they were not worth the candle of pursuing. [read post]