Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
Two justices (Scalia and Thomas) questioned the amount of deference properly afforded administrative interpretations in situations “that contemplate[] both criminal and administrative enforcement. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
In 1925, in its decision in Gitlow v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Capato, in which the Court will consider whether a child who was conceived after the death of a biological parent, but who cannot inherit personal property from that biological parent under applicable state intestacy law, is eligible for child survivor benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
Lee, supra, at 259-260; and no “less restrictive means,” see Thomas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Locke and James v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Tallent of counsel), for appellants.The West Firm, PLLC, Albany (Thomas S. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Tallent of counsel), for appellants.The West Firm, PLLC, Albany (Thomas S. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:35 am
Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
(and global) security. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
Dingemans LJ set out five factors which together in his view meant that the continuation of the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and that they were not worth the candle of pursuing. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
In Matal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
Besides IP law, I'm good at spotting trends, connecting people on social networks, fixing things, boiling eggs, and a handful of other things. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
