Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am
Professor MSO/Senior Researcher in International Law and Security at the Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen The Department of Political Science, in collaboration with the Faculty of Law, at the University of Copenhagen invites applications for a position as Professor MSO or Senior Researcher in international law and security at the Centre for Military Studies, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Copenhagen. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
.: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing onthe administration's Iran policy. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm
Professor MSO/Senior Researcher in International Law and Security at the Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen The Department of Political Science, in collaboration with the Faculty of Law, at the University of Copenhagen invites applications for a position as Professor MSO or Senior Researcher in international law and security at the Centre for Military Studies, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Copenhagen. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Thomas Seamands, the army's deputy chief of staff; Vice Adm. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Julie Gerberding, the co-chair of the commission on strengthening America’s health security at CSIS; Thomas Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; and Tara O'Toole, the executive vice president of In-Q-Tel, a non-profit venture capital firm. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Thomas does not believe that politics in any sense of that term — electoral politics, social movements, state action and regulation, organizing, even more radical notions of transformative change — can positively affect black people; he thinks politics mostly hurts black people. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Part I, we will address the recent per curiam opinion in Frank v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Michael Flynn—who would later serve as National Security Advisor in the Trump Administration—recalled that Trump made this request repeatedly…” [Vol. 1, p. 62] IV. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Justice Thomas only this past week, for example, indicated that the Court should not be hesitant to overrule its own precedents should they be manifestly unjust.I realize that I basically agree with the McCloskeyan approach and, therefore, am inclined to agree with much of Lessig’s argument insofar as it is similar. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Though the law has survived innumerable attempts at repeal and administrative sabotage, its intransigent foes, prominently including the Trump administration, are still out to kill it in the courts, and the residual skepticism seeded by the misbegotten-birth narrative could help legitimate their aspiration that, this third, legally absurd, attempt might just succeed. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
