Search for: "Thomas v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Two that come to mind, for example, are Evan Thomas’s The Man To See (1992) (about Edward Bennett Williams) and Louis Nizer’s  My Life In Court (1961). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:36 pm by Thomas Long
Originality, explained the appellate court, was ordinarily a question of fact, and the complaint plausibly alleged that the plaintiffs’ lyrics were protectable (Hall v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 5:50 pm by Stuart P. Meyer
Back in March, I reported on the breadth of comments the USPTO received in response to its new Guidance on patent subject matter eligibility. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 00170-19 Salih v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach – after investigation 07959-18 UWE Bristol v Bristol Post, 1 Accuracy (2018), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 02852-19 Cook v Stamford Mercury, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after… [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Margaret Taylor summarized the week’s clashes. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]