Search for: "Thomas v. United States of America" Results 341 - 360 of 1,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For much of the movement, it’s not just that church and state should be tight partners but also that the United States is and should be a Christian country. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that Monday’s decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute inter partes review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute inter partes review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm by Jim Walker
If you are inclined to voice your concerns to the Court, please write to her at the following address: Re:  United States of America v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:30 am
Thomas EdisonThomas Edison and many of the innovators following in his footsteps have been disgruntled and discouraged by United States patent law. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” But, as Thomas Hobbes always insisted, a people is a strictly artificial construction, which exists and acts only through the institutions that define its sovereignty. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
From 1968 to 1971, he served in the United States Army, including a tour in Vietnam. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am by Scott Bomboy
  In his 1897 report to the American Historical Association, Herman V. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:38 am by Hans von Spakovsky
What is odd about the challenge by blue states and liberal advocacy organizations is that even the United Nations — an institution they often hold up as a model of progressivism that the United States should emulate — sides with the Trump administration on this issue. [read post]