Search for: "Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
North American Stainless, LP, a man was fired after his fiancée filed a sexual discrimination charge against their mutual employer. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:50 pm by Lynberg & Watkins
North American Stainless, LP, the plaintiff and his fiancée worked for the same company. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by Donna
North American Stainless, LP, the Court ruled that the fiancé of an employee who complained about sex discrimination could bring a retaliation claim when he was fired shortly after she complained. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:46 am by Roy Ginsburg
North American Stainless, LP, No. 09-291, (argued December 7, 2010), an “associational discrimination” case that I wrote about previously. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by appealattorneylaw
North American Stainless, LP, 131 S.Ct. 863, 868 (noting that in Burlington Northern, “we held that Title VII’s antiretaliation provision must be construed to cover a broad range of employer conduct. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
North American Stainless, LP Issue: Is a third party afforded protection under the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
In Thompson v North American Stainless, LP, a male employee, who alleged that he was fired shortly after his fiancée filed an EEOC sex-bias charge against their shared employer, had no reprisal claim under Title VII. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:54 pm
North American Stainless LP, a divided Sixth Circuit panel expanded the class of persons protected from retaliation to include associated third-parties. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:59 am
North American Stainless LP, a divided Sixth Circuit panel expanded the class of persons protected from retaliation to include associated third-parties. [read post]