Search for: "Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 5:17 am
North American Stainless, LP, No. 09-291, by clicking here. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:29 am by tom
NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, LP 09-525    JANUS CAPITAL GROUP, ET AL. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:11 am by Jamie LaPlante
As an update to my earlier post on the Sixth Circuit's decision on third party or associational retaliation claims, the United States Supreme Court has agreed to review this decision. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
North American Stainless (09-291). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
North American Stainless, LP Issue: Is a third party afforded protection under the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:23 am
In Thompson, from February 1997 through March 2003, the plaintiff, Eric Thompson, worked as a metallurgical engineer for defendant North American Stainless, LP ("North American Stainless"). [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
In Thompson v North American Stainless, LP, a male employee, who alleged that he was fired shortly after his fiancée filed an EEOC sex-bias charge against their shared employer, had no reprisal claim under Title VII. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
North American Stainless LP held that an employee may sue for retaliatory acts against him by his employer in response to protected activity by a related employee—a close friend or family member. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
North American Stainless, LP, __ F.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563443 (6th Cir. 2009). [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:54 pm
North American Stainless LP, a divided Sixth Circuit panel expanded the class of persons protected from retaliation to include associated third-parties. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:01 pm
North American Stainless LP, a divided Sixth Circuit panel expanded the class of persons protected from retaliation to include associated third-parties. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:59 am
North American Stainless LP, a divided Sixth Circuit panel expanded the class of persons protected from retaliation to include associated third-parties. [read post]